|
|
(KN/m3) |
(lb/in3) |
|
|
(dry or moist) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Saturated) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The deflected shape of the beam and the distribution of soil pressure under the footing are dependent on the beam (footing) rigidity relative to the spring (soil) stiffness and types/locations of applied loads.
The stiffness of the beam relative to the foundation soil is governed by the beam’s Young’s modulus and cross section (b x h) and the soil modulus of sub-grade reaction ks (or beam EI and soil ks). By changing these parameters, the relative stiffness can be changed. If the beam (footing) is rigid relative to the spring (soil), the deflected shape and pressure distribution will be close to a straight line. More flexible beams will display a curved deflection and pressure distribution.
In the case of an eccentrically loaded footing, the deflected shape and the pressure distribution will be asymmetric.
Want to get some feeling of how the foundation responds? Please see OUR EXAMPLE or try some HOMEWORK problems.